Monday, December 14, 2009
and the sea turtle sprouted sheep feet.
Once there was a child who turned into a unicorn every midnight. His name was Simon B. The unicorn would jump in the air, sending sparkles to the earth. One day, Simon did not turn into a unicorn, but into a MULTI-horn, and his powers were magnified by the amount of horns protruding from his skull (7). But no sparkles rained down from the sky. So he said to a star, WHERE ARE THEY, OH LOVING ONE? And Star John answered, Wrong Answer. And Simon the Multi-horn was like, it was a question. And Star John smyted him, and never was there ever asked such a question again.
Sunday, November 15, 2009
miscommunication FTW TBH IMO LIRL
Dolly is ballin'. says:
okay i'm going to call you in like 5
when i get all my shit together
Mabis says:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaII3kUn5ug seriously listen to this
Mabis says:
such a happy song
ok listen to the song while you get it together
this is also the song from Yes Man btw
Dolly is ballin'. says:
i already told you
lirlll
Mabis says:
when the guy is gonna jump off the ledge
Dolly is ballin'. says:
i was singing it on the phone
WTF\ARE YOU SERIOUS
WHAT THE FUCK
Mabis says:
oh i must have blocked that
Dolly is ballin'. says:
\KRIRLRILRIRLRIRL
LRIRLRIRL
I SAID THIS WAS ON YES MAN
AND YOU WERE LIKE WHAT\
Mabis says:
hahah oh really?? HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
Dolly is ballin'. says:
I DONT REMEMBER THAT\RIRLRIRLIRL
Mabis says:
ARE YOU SERIOUS
Dolly is ballin'. says:
AHAHAAHA WOWOWOWOWOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WOOWWWWWWWWWWWWW
Mabis says:
HAHAHAH WOOOOOOOOW LIRL LAUGHING SO HARD RIGHT NOW
TWILIGHT ZONE TBH
LIRLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Dolly is ballin'. says:
HAHAHAAHAHA OMG WOWWWWWWW
I CANT EVEN BELIEVE THAT
okay i'm going to call you in like 5
when i get all my shit together
Mabis says:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaII3kUn5ug seriously listen to this
Mabis says:
such a happy song
ok listen to the song while you get it together
this is also the song from Yes Man btw
Dolly is ballin'. says:
i already told you
lirlll
Mabis says:
when the guy is gonna jump off the ledge
Dolly is ballin'. says:
i was singing it on the phone
WTF\ARE YOU SERIOUS
WHAT THE FUCK
Mabis says:
oh i must have blocked that
Dolly is ballin'. says:
\KRIRLRILRIRLRIRL
LRIRLRIRL
I SAID THIS WAS ON YES MAN
AND YOU WERE LIKE WHAT\
Mabis says:
hahah oh really?? HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
Dolly is ballin'. says:
I DONT REMEMBER THAT\RIRLRIRLIRL
Mabis says:
ARE YOU SERIOUS
Dolly is ballin'. says:
AHAHAAHA WOWOWOWOWOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
WOOWWWWWWWWWWWWW
Mabis says:
HAHAHAH WOOOOOOOOW LIRL LAUGHING SO HARD RIGHT NOW
TWILIGHT ZONE TBH
LIRLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Dolly is ballin'. says:
HAHAHAAHAHA OMG WOWWWWWWW
I CANT EVEN BELIEVE THAT
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Saturday, October 3, 2009
Then you have to eat something.
I want to know what the instrumental part of the song is called when the sound goes down and becomes dense. Complex. It's dark and beautiful and makes your heart squeeze, and you're trying to get through a suddenly thick bushel of sound when again so suddenly it soars, swells up, up into crystal blue skies with a bird and fluffy cloud, and you realize you've been holding your breath.
I need to know what that segment of the song is called.
I need to know what that segment of the song is called.
Friday, August 7, 2009
album sales are driven by ghosts
The first law of thermodynamics is that energy can be neither created or destroyed. We are made from energy - in fact, everything is. When our bodies die and return to the earth, they feed the soil and, in turn, the trees and the plants, etc etc. Ashes to ashes, energy to energy.
Now, time is also an entity of some kind. There is the age old question one person might ask another, in a metaphorical or facetious kind of way: you're sitting on your white-painted wicker furniture on the porch at dusk one summer evening, and you look at the person sitting next to you and realize that the summer is almost over, and you find yourself asking: 'where does the time go?' But when you take a closer look at that question, it isn't just a meaningless question without an answer. Time has to go SOMEWHERE, because it is someTHING. Just as gravity is an invisible force that holds us down on our planet, time is an equally invisible-but-none-the-less real force that continues to push all living things forward, completely unstoppable and uncontrolled.
So where does it go? It can't just fall into the abyss because, as we concluded, energy - something everything is made up of - can be neither created or destroyed. So it must, as the Taoists believe, be cyclical, not linear. Therefore, it must recycle itself.
The question becomes not "where does it go?", but 'what does it transform into?' The Mayan calandar stops at 2012, and this can be attributed simply to the fact that the ancient civilization could not be expected to document the future years of all eternity. But maybe they were onto something - maybe that is the end of time's cycle, and it will continue on again fresh and new starting that year. That is not to say there will be an apocolyptic ending, or that we will be able to sense a change. No; if time recycling is true and real, then it would just continue on like any other day, a new beginning but not one that is dramatic or life-changing or even noticeable.
There could be other theories or explainations. If energy is neither created nor destroyed, and whatever is within the human body is energy (call it your essence, your soul, your being, your consciousness, whatever), then something has to happen to that soul (being, essence, et all). Perhaps there is a heaven, but that doesn't seem entirely plausible. What could happen is as time recycles, so do souls - into new bodies, new lives, with new purpose and new lives. Or maybe we live the same life over and over and over again without change, just in different dimensions, with start and end dates randomly selected. Or perhaps we live similar lives to the one preceding it, but they are never completely identical, because even in nature, finding something exactly the same as another is not very common.
That just might be it.
Now, time is also an entity of some kind. There is the age old question one person might ask another, in a metaphorical or facetious kind of way: you're sitting on your white-painted wicker furniture on the porch at dusk one summer evening, and you look at the person sitting next to you and realize that the summer is almost over, and you find yourself asking: 'where does the time go?' But when you take a closer look at that question, it isn't just a meaningless question without an answer. Time has to go SOMEWHERE, because it is someTHING. Just as gravity is an invisible force that holds us down on our planet, time is an equally invisible-but-none-the-less real force that continues to push all living things forward, completely unstoppable and uncontrolled.
So where does it go? It can't just fall into the abyss because, as we concluded, energy - something everything is made up of - can be neither created or destroyed. So it must, as the Taoists believe, be cyclical, not linear. Therefore, it must recycle itself.
The question becomes not "where does it go?", but 'what does it transform into?' The Mayan calandar stops at 2012, and this can be attributed simply to the fact that the ancient civilization could not be expected to document the future years of all eternity. But maybe they were onto something - maybe that is the end of time's cycle, and it will continue on again fresh and new starting that year. That is not to say there will be an apocolyptic ending, or that we will be able to sense a change. No; if time recycling is true and real, then it would just continue on like any other day, a new beginning but not one that is dramatic or life-changing or even noticeable.
There could be other theories or explainations. If energy is neither created nor destroyed, and whatever is within the human body is energy (call it your essence, your soul, your being, your consciousness, whatever), then something has to happen to that soul (being, essence, et all). Perhaps there is a heaven, but that doesn't seem entirely plausible. What could happen is as time recycles, so do souls - into new bodies, new lives, with new purpose and new lives. Or maybe we live the same life over and over and over again without change, just in different dimensions, with start and end dates randomly selected. Or perhaps we live similar lives to the one preceding it, but they are never completely identical, because even in nature, finding something exactly the same as another is not very common.
That just might be it.
Friday, July 31, 2009
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Ugly people II
Spin off from last week's question: is the familiar beautiful?
Has anyone ever noticed that the two halves of many couples are NOT created equal?
I used to work in a high-end jewellery store, and it came to my attention that, more often than not, a couple that came in to look at engagement rings or wedding bands were not standing at an equal level of attractiveness. We are about to blow your mind, but listen close: In these situations, the man in the relationship was usually markedly more attractive than his female partner.
Of course, this first begs the obvious question -- are men really not as superficial as society would have us believe? Hollywood suggests that man-trolls have the ability to score the supermodels, yet real life scenarios are telling us otherwise. Really good looking men - men who could probably attract any hot (conventionally or otherwise) woman - are ending up with women that range from average to unattractive.
It should be noted that we are not talking "somewhat attractive" or "okay" looking women ... we're talking men who are 7's or 8's or 9's and women who are 2's or 3's.
THE REAL QUESTION here is as follows: are these men attracted to these women because of their personalities and then, because they love them/they are familiar, find them beautiful? Or do they honestly find these women beautiful from the get-go? Do they ever recognize the disparity, or do their love-goggles keep them clueless? What are the factors that affect how a man views a woman or chooses her as his partner?
Discuss.
Has anyone ever noticed that the two halves of many couples are NOT created equal?
I used to work in a high-end jewellery store, and it came to my attention that, more often than not, a couple that came in to look at engagement rings or wedding bands were not standing at an equal level of attractiveness. We are about to blow your mind, but listen close: In these situations, the man in the relationship was usually markedly more attractive than his female partner.
Of course, this first begs the obvious question -- are men really not as superficial as society would have us believe? Hollywood suggests that man-trolls have the ability to score the supermodels, yet real life scenarios are telling us otherwise. Really good looking men - men who could probably attract any hot (conventionally or otherwise) woman - are ending up with women that range from average to unattractive.
It should be noted that we are not talking "somewhat attractive" or "okay" looking women ... we're talking men who are 7's or 8's or 9's and women who are 2's or 3's.
THE REAL QUESTION here is as follows: are these men attracted to these women because of their personalities and then, because they love them/they are familiar, find them beautiful? Or do they honestly find these women beautiful from the get-go? Do they ever recognize the disparity, or do their love-goggles keep them clueless? What are the factors that affect how a man views a woman or chooses her as his partner?
Discuss.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
